|
Self-realization All alone the ONE (or Mother, i.e. the Matrix as creation algorithm, Brahman, God, pan-theos or pan-deus) ‘waits’ (hence at random, i.e. without momentum) prior to
contact and, via a series of contacts, to movement (thus change) and
limitation (thus form/identity). Though virtually whole, hence perfect, her
true potential is incomplete because though omnipresent, omniscient (meaning
capable of unlimited random contact) and omnipotent she remains unreal and
unidentifiable. More…
To acquire realness and form (i.e. identity) she
creates an ‘other’ that serves as reflective touch (meaning contact) screen.
She creates the ‘other’ by generating an identical but transient copy of
herself (i.e. a fractal elaboration with like plasticity), a painful
procedure because it renders here momentarily imperfect. Each ‘other’, that is to say, each copy she creates, and she creates myriads, adapts (i.e. moulds) itself (like a Turing Machine) to is interactions and which limit (and thereby identify) it, thus becoming an alternate whole/perfect but yet incomplete self. It’s when the perfect but incomplete ‘others’ (i.e. the Matrix’s limited copies, and which she is) contact (i.e. couple or copulate with) each other that they become real (i.e. true) and identified, therefore self-complete, thereby displaying, bit by bit, the ONE’s true virtual potential made real and identifiable. It’s by 1:1 touch (i.e. by direct contact,
copulation, i.e. by an act of perception ≈ knowledge) that realness
happens. It’s by serial adaptation via serial differentiated touch/contact
(i.e. perception) that (self-)
identity is generated. Fundamental (i.e. radical, primary) self-realization is the experience of
realness, meaning the (@1c2) experience of ‘am’. Differential
(i.e. relative) self-realization, meaning the experience of ‘I am’ happens as
side-effect of serial primary self-realization. The response to the achievement of both forms of complete self-realization is bliss. Both mother (i.e. the One as matrix, i.e. as basic
creation algorithm) and child (as matrix/fractal copy locally elaborated as
an ‘other’ or alternate) become completely self-realized (i.e. self-real/true) if and when she contacts, copulates with (i.e. perceives, gets
direct 1:1 knowledge of) her locally altered, i.e. adapted, copy/child
(indeed, as the Goddess Durga who as it were swallows her child, i.e. as in a
tantric consummation). In short, the countless ‘others’ (all alternates
not opposites, although the ‘others’ compete with each other as opposites,
hence as predators) which the perfect but incomplete ONE creates operate as it were like interactive pixels. All the
pixels together, that is to say, the observable universe/nature, are the ONE’s (i.e. pan-theos’ or deus’) virtual creative potential made actual, meaning
real and identifiable, hence conscious.* In other
words, the differentiated copies of the perfect One when interactive (i.e. at
contact) provide the perfect One with transient (actually momentary)
completeness. Or as the Scythian recluse Siddartha,
later called Buddha, stated 2500 years ago: “Consciousness* arises from contact.” “Whatever arises, ceases” “Arising and ceasing happen
subject to conditions” *… For
consciousness read: Latin con-
‘with’ + scire ‘know’, whereby a
quantum of knowledge is defined as a 1c2 reality. Primary
knowledge (i.e. ‘am’) happens as the effect of a 1:1 (or 1 with 1) random
contact. Self-con’sciousness (e.g. I am’) is
experienced as 1: n (1’s) random contacts. For contact, touch, coupling or
copulation read also: per’ception. God, the 1, is
perfect but incomplete © 2016 Victor Langheld |
