|
Self-realization All
alone the ONE (or Mother, i.e. the Matrix as creation algorithm, Brahman, God, pan-theos or pan-deus)
‘waits’ (hence at random, i.e. without momentum) prior to contact and, via a
series of contacts, to movement (thus change) and limitation (thus form/identity).
Though virtually whole, hence perfect, her true potential is incomplete
because though omnipresent, omniscient (meaning capable of unlimited random
contact) and omnipotent she remains unreal and unidentifiable. More…
To acquire
realness and form (i.e. identity) she creates an ‘other’ that serves as
reflective touch (meaning contact) screen. She creates the ‘other’ by generating
an identical but transient copy of herself (i.e. a fractal elaboration with
like plasticity), a painful procedure because it renders here momentarily
imperfect. Each ‘other’, that is to say, each copy she creates, and she creates myriads, adapts (i.e. moulds) itself (like a Turing Machine) to is interactions and which limit (and thereby identify) it, thus becoming an alternate whole/perfect but yet incomplete self. It’s when the perfect but incomplete ‘others’ (i.e. the Matrix’s limited copies, and which she is) contact (i.e. couple or copulate with) each other that they become real (i.e. true) and identified, therefore self-complete, thereby displaying, bit by bit, the ONE’s true virtual potential made real and identifiable. It’s by 1:1 touch
(i.e. by direct contact, copulation, i.e. by an act of perception ≈
knowledge) that realness happens. It’s by serial adaptation via serial
differentiated touch/contact (i.e. perception) that (self-) identity is generated. Fundamental (i.e. radical, primary)
self-realization is the experience
of realness, meaning the (@1c2) experience of ‘am’. Differential
(i.e. relative) self-realization, meaning the experience of ‘I am’ happens as
side-effect of serial primary self-realization. The response to the achievement of both forms of complete self-realization
is bliss. Both mother (i.e.
the One as matrix, i.e. as basic creation algorithm) and child (as matrix/fractal
copy locally elaborated as an ‘other’ or alternate) become completely self-realized (i.e. self-real/true) if
and when she contacts, copulates with (i.e. perceives, gets direct 1:1
knowledge of) her locally altered, i.e. adapted, copy/child (indeed, as the
Goddess Durga who as it were swallows her child,
i.e. as in a tantric consummation). In short, the
countless ‘others’ (all alternates not opposites, although the ‘others’
compete with each other as opposites, hence as predators) which the perfect but
incomplete
ONE creates operate as it were like interactive pixels. All the pixels
together, that is to say, the observable universe/nature, are the ONE’s (i.e. pan-theos’ or deus’) virtual
creative potential made actual, meaning real and identifiable, hence
conscious.* In other words, the differentiated
copies of the perfect One when interactive (i.e. at contact) provide the
perfect One with transient (actually momentary) completeness. Or as the Scythian
recluse Siddartha, later called Buddha, stated 2500
years ago: “Consciousness* arises from contact.” “Whatever arises, ceases” “Arising and ceasing happen
subject to conditions” *… For consciousness read: Latin con- ‘with’ + scire ‘know’, whereby a quantum
of knowledge is defined as a 1c2 reality. Primary knowledge (i.e. ‘am’)
happens as the effect of a 1:1 (or 1 with 1) random contact. Self-con’sciousness (e.g. I am’) is experienced as 1: n (1’s)
random contacts. For contact, touch, coupling or copulation read also: per’ception. God, the 1, is perfect but
incomplete © 2016 Victor Langheld |
