‘The perfect slave
is free’
Victor 1976
Or: ‘The perfect
sub-server becomes (is @1 with) the master server, hence free (-r).’
Victor
2016
Within samsara (meaning endless re-birth/death)
those who perfect their dharma get promoted (i.e. promote themselves towards eventual
freedom from re-death);
those who fail to perfect their dharma get demoted
(i.e. demote themselves).
The
Jina Upanishad
Reified
(i.e. quantised ≈ bit)
notions
|
Synonyms
|
The analogue, meaning serial
(or bite) view
The non-reified view
|
Notes
This, the missing and wholly optimistic, hence
politically incorrect because a-political 14th Upanishad, is reconstructed
from scattered intuitions/statements in the Veda, Yoga, Buddhism and from
direct observation of the most common everyday human survival activity.
|
perfect
|
≈ complete ≈ whole ≈ @
min.entropy ≈ enstatic
≈ closed or ended as fact
|
Perfecting
≈ per’facting ≈ ending ≈
terminating
|
Perfection happens at function completion ≈ 100%
algorithm application ≈ fractal elaboration ending and when
@min.entropy status is attained and the process presents as whole, steady
state, i.e. as enstatic
quantum.
|
Slave (-ing)
|
≈
dependent servant ≈ slave as secondary to nth
sub-server
Note: The master (and who appears free, meaning independent, to
the servant/slave) functions merely as 1st or primary
servant/server/ algorithm.
|
Dependent
slaving ≈ serving as : an (wholly recursive output generating) algorithm ≈ a
fractal (that generates n elaborations)
|
Dependent (on conditions or rules) origination, meaning fundamental slavery,
was discovered by Siddartha, the Scythian recluse, later called the Buddha.
‘Conditions determine form, not an (abiding) self (or soul).’ Contact (meaning
copulation of 2 random quanta) creates is’ness/realness, i.e. a 1c2
moment.
A slave (i.e. as sub-server) is a quantum that submits
(or surrenders) its output (i.e. its dharma capacity) to a master (server).
Slaves (i.e. sub-servers) are fundamentally
female, because submissive. They achieve libido highs (and thereby the
honeymoon affect) via surrender, meaning penetration (producing
fertilization).
The purpose/dharma of the slave is
to execute the master’s need deriving from the master’s dharma imperfection.
Hence the purpose of a dynamic living system is to execute the need of the
imperfect Atman/Brahman, imperfect because lacking form and realness, thus
consciousness. It is this latter and exceedingly troublesome understanding
that is missing from the main Upanishads and the vast collection of
commentaries. By executing one’s dharma perfectly one as it were merges
with (and becomes) the Atman/Brahman and so attains to the latter’s freedom.
|
is
|
≈ @ c2
≈ momentary is’ness
|
creates a
series of is’ness moments/quanta
falsely
named ‘being’
|
A 1c2 moment (in other words a contact
as copulation between 2 random (or differential) quanta) presents as (minimum)
quantum (i.e. bit) of knowledge.
|
free (s)
|
≈
random (access) ≈ unlimited ≈ independent
|
≈ non-relative (bit) momentum
≈
random movement
≈ virtual
(non-located) presence
|
The slave (i.e. a, i.e. any and every slave routine as fractal elaboration) becomes (i.e. emulates,
copies) master (i.e. the master routine as fractal), hence free, by means
of self-perfection, i.e. completion.
Attempting to achieve freedom (i.e. moksha) by the
(pessimistic, indeed life denying) means proposed in the Upanishads (and in
parts of Yoga/Samkya, Buddhism, Jainism and so on) and further developed by
foolish Brahmin bookworms, such as Nagarjuna and Shankara,
namely by restricting, i.e. reverting from self-application (i.e. towards
‘factory settings’, i.e. to the nirguna Brahman/Atman) defeats the purpose
of the universal Brahman/Atman function-as-algorithm, namely creation the
pays off with sat-cit-ananda, and reveals ignorance (Sanskrit: avidya) of
the true understanding of tattvamasi.
|
as a master
|
≈ as a monad ≈ as a random (albeit
virtual) event that carries
instruction, hence can create moments of is’ness and series of moments of
is’ness experienced as real forms (i.e. identities or selves)
|
≈ mastering ≈ applying the
brahman/atman dharma
≈
god rules
≈ algorithm perfectly (to a locality or
niche)
|
Perfect execution of a slave routine (i.e. a
dependent dharma) synchronises, i.e. becomes one with the master routine
(i.e. the independent dharma). The perfect slave is indistinguishable from,
because unified with, the master and therefore experiences the master’s
freedom.
By perfecting momentarily one’s dependent dharma
one resonates (momentarily) wholly with the universal, wholly independent
dharma (of Brahman/Atman) and is momentarily free (of samsara ≈ the
grind of imperfect serving resulting in unhappiness, pain and so on).
|
Copulating
(or coupling) one’s perfected (one down) slave routine with the (one up)
master routine transfers the master routine’s (one up) freedom to the
sub-routine.
© 2016 Victor Langheld
|